Posted by: rbmcarriers | June 6, 2008

Speed Limiter Debate Update

The atmosphere yesterday at the public hearing in Toronto on the Speed Limiter was probably as hot and humid as the temperature today in Ontario. Again, it is a question of who has more pull and more force behind their comments. We will all know the outcome soon. If you have a strong opinion either way, now is the time to make your voice known. The deadline has been extended to June 10th at 5pm.

Courtesy of Truck News by James Menzies

Speed limiters debated during public hearings
Committee to extend comment period

Mistake. Unsafe. Incredulous. Those were some of the words used to describe Ontario’s speed limiter legislation during public hearings today at Queen’s Park.

However, the well-oiled PR machine led by the Ontario Trucking Association (OTA) was also on-hand to present some compelling arguments of its own as the two sides sparred all day over Bill 41, which would mechanically limit truck speeds in Ontario to 105 km/h. Their audience was the Standing Committee on Justice Policy, consisting of MPPs from the governing Liberals as well as Opposition parties.

Representing the pro-speed limiter crowd were: the OTA; Canadian Trucking Alliance; Brian Taylor of Liberty Linehaul; the Ontario Safety League; the Insurance Bureau of Canada; the American Trucking Associations; and Jeff Bryan of Jeff Bryan Transport. They insisted speed limiters would improve road safety and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Countering, from the anti-speed limiter corner, were: the Owner/Operators’ Independent Drivers’ Association (OOIDA); the Owner-Operators’ Business Association of Canada (OBAC); Dorothy Sanderson of Women in Trucking; the Canadian Owner/Operators’ Co-operative; and Dr. Barry Prentice of the University of Manitoba, I.H. Asper School of Business.

They argued that safety may in fact be compromised by the legislation, that the emissions reductions are debatable and that trade with the US could be impeded by the bill.

At the end of the day, the committee agreed to extend the public comment period from its original deadline of end-of-day today, to June 10 at 5 p.m. The extension came after the committee was chastised about the short notice provided for public input. Notice of the hearing was posted by the Legislature on Monday morning and those wishing to present had only until noon that same day to make a request. Written submissions were only to be accepted until 5 p.m today.

OBAC executive director Joanne Ritchie, who was scheduled to appear in person, instead called from the 10 Acre Truck Stop in Belleville, Ont. where she pulled over to rest on her way to Toronto after pulling an all-nighter to work on her presentation. She condemned the committee for providing such short notice. Her point was well-received.

Now, further comments can be submitted right up until June 10, via e-mail to clerk Susan Sourial at or by fax at 416-325-3505.

The arguments in favour of speed limiters seemed to carry the momentum early in the day. OTA’s Bradley said “As an industry that shares its workplace with the public, we have the added responsibility to do the right thing.”

His group was lauded by safety groups and the ATA. Dave Osiecki, vice-president, safety, security and operations, said “In general, ATA supports Bill 41 as written” and he added “we do not believe Bill 41 would create significant impediments to cross-border trade.” He said he hopes the ATA will succeed in implementing its own, slightly different, speed limiter policy and that the two laws can be harmonized at a later date. At one point, a Liberal MPP said he was having trouble finding any reason not to support the legislation.

But as the day wore on, committee members from Opposition parties seemed befuddled by the vastly different opinions they were hearing on the issue – especially MPP Frank Klees, Caucus Chair for the Official Opposition and critic for the Ministry of Transportation.

He said he was “puzzled how people in the same industry can be arguing opposite sides of the equation.”

“What really is underlying this debate?” he asked. “Why do we have people in this industry that have come to this committee and said ‘Don’t do this. It’s dangerous?'”

It was a point he returned to as the hearing wrapped up, noting he was “still searching” for the core issue of the debate. “I’m missing something here,” he said, also suggesting he was uncomfortable supporting the legislation without first soliciting further feedback.

NDP MPP Cheri DiNovo agreed, saying “I think we need more time to (allow stakeholders to) make submissions.”

The deadline for amendments to be made to the legislation is June 11. Discussions today suggested that if the legislation proceeds, the most likely amendments will include expanding the legislation to cover motor coaches and increasing the fine for offenders from the currently discussed $250.



  1. I have a question

    id like to no if the goverment of ontario can emplament theys speed limiters going on heavy trucks and if this is going to the job that thay say now i think that its going to be a big payne in the but and i feal that it a aganest the charter of rights & freedom , and it should not forsted on any body becouse its just make the hole industry look worse then it is and i hope that it back fires , and what its going to do is forse a lot more trucks drivers get out of the industry and move on with something elts , i no that I’m one of them im and owner / operator for over 25 years and i have save driving awards now and im sick of the hole dam indursty ower goverment is not doing any thing for us so but just forsing a lot good people to get out of it all together . And one more thing how is this law going to be inforesed with the rest of the canada & the USA

  2. Women In Trucking did NOT participate in this forum, and although Dorothy Sanderson is an individual member of our association, she was not representing our organization. We have not taken a stance on this debate.

    Ellen Voie
    Women In Trucking, Inc.

  3. Thanks Ellen for your clarification. The story posted here was taken, as indicated from Truck News.

  4. Rick thanks for your comment and your question! But we at RBM do not have the answer – the trucking industry on the whole is probably asking the same question. Stay tuned, we will report all that we know on this debate!


  6. the problem isn’t 105kpm, it’s that NO two trucks will maintain 105 the same. You will be left no choice but to always be tailgating, you catch someone you’ll be unable to pass, slow down and someone will pass you sitting right in frint of you. I think the real issue is the big companies are just wanting to dumby proof the job. If you take control of the truck from the driver[ speed limiter, automatic transmiison, taction contol, roll over protection] you no longer need a professional driver, just a heart beat. ANYONE with any miles under their belt and a brain knows it wont work, we already see it with the trucks we deal with know that are governed

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: